Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Perforator flaps/Microsurgery

Flap reconstruction offers an autologous (your own tissue) reconstruction, and gives many of the benefits described in earlier posts, such as a soft and "natural" breast mound. Such flaps also are much better for those with a history of radiation, or those who will ultimately require postoperative radiation therapy following mastectomy. Autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction offer the best options for these purposes, until the possibility of reconstruction with stem cells becomes a reality. The conventional autologous flap reconstruction requires sacrificing a muscle to reconstruct the breast, either the latissimus dorsi or rectus abdominis muscle. Although popular and reliable procedures to accomplish the goal of breast reconstruction, some of the expected outcomes that coincide are increased pain and seroma formation, along with functional deficits, weakness, and increased rates of hernias/bulges in the areas where the muscle was taken.


Perforator flaps have come to the forefront of plastic & reconstructive surgery due to their decreased morbidity, decreased recuperation time, and increased aesthetic results. This is due in part since they are muscle-sparing procedures, which subsequently maintain muscle function and do not have any morbidity associated with sacrificing of muscles, such as those described previously. Since these types of flaps are technically challenging and more complex, microsurgical expertise is required and as such, very few plastic surgeons in the United States are skilled enough to perform these perforator flaps successfully. In addition to the elaborate dissection of these flaps, albeit tedious, the flap must be reanastomosed under a microscope to blood vessels in the nearby recipient site.


Although a poplar procedure elsewhere in the world, patients in the U.S. often must travel far to find a surgeon capable of performing these perforator flaps, such as the DIEP, SIEA, SGAP, TUG, or ALT flap (DIEP - abdominal skin/tissue only; SIEA - abdominal skin/tissue only; SGAP - buttock skin/tissue only; TUG - groin skin/tissue only; ALT - lateral thigh skin/tissue only). These flaps spare muscle and are arguably the best reconstructive options that we have today. To find a surgeon near you who perform such free tissue transfer breast reconstructions, see the links provided to the right.


Breast reconstruction does not delay treatment for your cancer, if necessary, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Literature shows no increase in recurrence rate or survival rate nor any decreased ability to diagnose such cancers. n fact, the most recent literature has even shown a decreased recurrence rate with immediate breast reconstruction. With all of this in mind, as well as knowing the the superior aesthetic results that are associated with immediate breast reconstruction (reconstruction performed at the same time as your mastectomy), I recommend discussing all of your breast reconstruction options with a plastic surgeon who specializes in breast reconstruction before your mastectomy procedure...please refer to my earliest posts on breast reconstructive options and understanding all of your options.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Part IV: Flap-based reconstruction - DIEP flap

DIEP flap


The use of microsurgery and perforator flaps, such as the DIEP flap, is the newest and state of the art technique for plastic & reconstructive surgery today, including breast reconstruction. Very few plastic surgeons perform this technique due to its complexity, time, and skill involved, but such reconstruction arguably provides the best aesthetic outcome with less morbidity, since only perforating vessels are utilized and muscle is not sacrificed for the flap reconstruction, for those women who are candidates for this unique procedure. However, it is a very popular technique elsewhere in the world and by those few surgeons who perform it in the United States. It is a procedure that has been refined through my fellowship training, and one in which women throughout the United States consult for to perform this innovative type of breast reconstruction, such as the DIEP flap.


Like the conventional TRAM flap procedure, the perforator flap DIEP breast reconstruction offers the advantages such as those offered by the TRAM flap, however, without the sacrifice of the rectus abdominis muscle - only the excess skin and fat from your lower abdominal wall is harvested for the flap...the muscle is left intact on your abdominal wall. This gives the distinct advantage of a completely autologous breast reconstruction, without need for an implant. In addition, since it is a muscle sparing procedure where the rectus abdominis muscle is not sacrificed, your abdominal wall integrity is maintained, leaving a much lower chance of bulges or hernias after the procedure than the TRAM flap.


The flap and its blood vessels are then disconnected entirely from the body, and the entire flap is then relocated to its new location in the breast area as a free tissue transfer. Its corresponding blood vessels are then reattached to blood vessels in the nearby area, using microsurgical techniques. Afterwards, the entire flap may be turned, twisted, or inset in the best position possible to contour a new breast for you. The conventional pedicled TRAM flap is limited in its insetting since it remains attached to its muscle insertion and blood supply superiorly.


Much like a tummy tuck, your abdominal incision will be sutured closed, first by repairing the abdominal wall, then by suturing your incision, leaving a single incision at the lower abdomen, hidden within your bikini line. To finish the closure, your umbilicus (belly button) will be brought out through a small incision, and sutured at its normal anatomic location.


General guidelines:

· Hospitalization: 5-7 days

· Advantages: Same as for the TRAM flap, but decreased hernia/bulge risk due to the fact that the muscle is spared and abdominal wall integrity maintained

· Disadvantages: Same as for the TRAM flap; complex procedure; abdominal wall integrity maintained (minimal hernia/bulge risk – much less than conventional TRAM flap)

Sunday, October 4, 2009